PCGameBenchmarks

Can Radeon RX 7600 run Chests, City, Clicker?

Great

The Radeon RX 7600 handles Chests, City, Clicker well at 1080p, delivering approximately 697 FPS at High settings — above the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay. It can also achieve smooth 1440p at around 523 FPS.

Chests, City, ClickerRadeon RX 7600 FPS Data

Quality1080p1440p4K
Low999+ fps817 fps435 fps
Medium871 fps653 fps348 fps
High697 fps523 fps279 fps
Ultra566 fps425 fps226 fps

Estimated FPS · actual performance may vary based on drivers and settings

Minimum System Requirements

CPU
2.33GHz or faster x86-compatible processor, or Intel Atom™ 1.6GHz or faster processor for netbook class devices
GPU
DirectX 9.0c compatible video card

About

"Chests, City, Clicker" (2023) is an engaging idle clicker game that combines simple mechanics with strategic decision-making. In this title, players gradually accumulate wealth by spending time in-game and making choices that enhance their earnings. Its notable appeal lies in how it encourages players to find the most effective strategies for maximizing profit while keeping the gameplay experience accessible and fun.

For optimal performance, "Chests, City, Clicker" is designed to run well on a variety of systems, largely making it accessible to a broader audience. It can be played on entry-level GPUs with a minimum score of around 600, allowing a smooth experience while maintaining respectable FPS. Even modest setups can achieve solid performance, so gamers looking for an enjoyable experience without high-end hardware can feel confident diving into this title.

Considering its favorable ratings and the relaxing nature of the idle clicker genre, "Chests, City, Clicker" is worth a try for players who enjoy easy-to-pick-up games. The straightforward mechanics and engaging gameplay make it an excellent choice for casual gamers or those seeking a break from more intense gaming experiences.

More Chests, City, Clicker GPU benchmarks

Can Radeon RX 7600 Run Chests, City, Clicker? — 697 FPS at 1080p | PCGameBenchmarks