PCGameBenchmarks

Can GeForce GTX 1060 run Cube Escape: Paradox?

Great

The GeForce GTX 1060 handles Cube Escape: Paradox well at 1080p, delivering approximately 789 FPS at High settings — above the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay. It can also achieve smooth 1440p at around 591 FPS.

Cube Escape: ParadoxGeForce GTX 1060 FPS Data

Quality1080p1440p4K
Low999+ fps924 fps493 fps
Medium986 fps739 fps394 fps
High789 fps591 fps315 fps
Ultra641 fps481 fps256 fps

Estimated FPS · actual performance may vary based on drivers and settings

Minimum System Requirements

CPU
1.8 Ghz Processor
GPU
Direct X 9.0c compatible video card
RAM
1 GB

Genres

About

Cube Escape: Paradox is a free-to-play adventure game from 2018 that follows detective Dale Vandermeer as he becomes trapped between two parallel universes. This indie title combines point-and-click puzzle gameplay with an intriguing mystery narrative, offering players a compelling story experience alongside brain-teasing challenges. The game was released alongside an accompanying film called Paradox: A Rusty Lake Film, creating a multimedia experience.

Cube Escape: Paradox is extremely accessible from a performance standpoint, requiring only 1 GB of RAM and modest GPU requirements. You'll see consistent FPS performance on virtually any integrated graphics or entry-level discrete GPU from the past decade, making this an ideal title for benchmark testing on budget hardware. Even on older systems, you should expect smooth gameplay at high graphics settings with no performance bottlenecks, though actual FPS will vary based on your specific GPU tier and resolution.

With a rating of 64/100, Cube Escape: Paradox offers a solid experience for fans of puzzle-adventure games, though it's not universally acclaimed. If you enjoy narrative-driven indie adventures with mystery elements, it's worth playing given the free-to-play model and reasonable playtime investment.

More Cube Escape: Paradox GPU benchmarks

Can GeForce GTX 1060 Run Cube Escape: Paradox? — 789 FPS at 1080p | PCGameBenchmarks