PCGameBenchmarks

Can GeForce GTX 1060 run Hidden & Dangerous: Action Pack?

Great

The GeForce GTX 1060 handles Hidden & Dangerous: Action Pack well at 1080p, delivering approximately 473 FPS at High settings — above the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay. It can also achieve smooth 1440p at around 355 FPS.

Hidden & Dangerous: Action PackGeForce GTX 1060 FPS Data

Quality1080p1440p4K
Low739 fps555 fps296 fps
Medium591 fps444 fps237 fps
High473 fps355 fps189 fps
Ultra384 fps288 fps154 fps

Estimated FPS · actual performance may vary based on drivers and settings

Minimum System Requirements

CPU
1.4 GHz or faster
GPU
3D Graphics card compatible with DirectX 9.0
RAM
1 GB

Genres

About

Hidden & Dangerous: Action Pack, released in 2017, is a tactical action and strategy game set in the year 1941. Players take on the role of a special forces team stranded deep within enemy territory, relying on strategic thinking and combat skills to navigate challenges and complete missions. This blend of action-oriented gameplay and strategy makes it a notable title in the genre, inviting players to immerse themselves in a historically inspired narrative.

In terms of PC performance, Hidden & Dangerous: Action Pack is quite accessible, making it a solid option for gamers with lower-end hardware. With a minimum GPU requirement of an entry-level graphics card scoring around 300, many integrated graphics solutions can run the game smoothly. Players can expect decent frame rates (FPS) on modest setups, and for better performance, a mid-tier GPU will enhance graphics settings without compromising gameplay fluidity.

Overall, if you're a fan of tactical shooters and strategy games, Hidden & Dangerous: Action Pack is worth a look. With a rating of 70/100, it strikes a balance between engaging gameplay and historical narrative, making it a commendable choice for both casual and dedicated players alike.

More Hidden & Dangerous: Action Pack GPU benchmarks

Can GeForce GTX 1060 Run Hidden & Dangerous: Action Pack? — 473 FPS at 1080p | PCGameBenchmarks