PCGameBenchmarks

Can GeForce RTX 4060 Ti run JR East Train Simulator: Yamanote Line (Osaki to Osaki) E235-0 series?

Great

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti handles JR East Train Simulator: Yamanote Line (Osaki to Osaki) E235-0 series well at 1080p, delivering approximately 118 FPS at High settings — above the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay. It can also achieve smooth 1440p at around 88 FPS.

JR East Train Simulator: Yamanote Line (Osaki to Osaki) E235-0 seriesGeForce RTX 4060 Ti FPS Data

Quality1080p1440p4K
Low184 fps138 fps74 fps
Medium147 fps111 fps59 fps
High118 fps88 fps47 fps
Ultra96 fps72 fps38 fps

Estimated FPS · actual performance may vary based on drivers and settings

Minimum System Requirements

CPU
Intel Core i5-8500 or AMD Ryzen 5 2600
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (VRAM 6GB)
RAM
16 GB

Genres

About

For optimal performance in this train simulation, an entry-level GPU such as the GTX 1650 or RX 6500 XT is recommended as a minimum. These GPUs will allow players to enjoy the experience at 1080p with medium settings, providing a smooth frame rate for the detailed environments and realistic train dynamics. For those looking for a more immersive experience, a mid-range GPU like the GTX 1660 Super or RX 6600 will enable higher settings and better graphical fidelity, particularly at 1440p.

The game is relatively accessible in terms of hardware requirements, making it suitable for a wide range of PCs. With 16 GB of RAM as the minimum, players with more powerful hardware can achieve even better performance at 1440p or higher resolutions. Overall, those with entry to mid-tier graphics cards can expect a satisfying experience, while high-end users will enjoy the full visual potential of this simulation. It's recommended to adjust settings based on your hardware's capabilities for the best experience.

More JR East Train Simulator: Yamanote Line (Osaki to Osaki) E235-0 series GPU benchmarks

Can GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Run JR East Train Simulator: Yamanote Line (Osaki to Osaki) E235-0 series? — 118 FPS at 1080p | PCGameBenchmarks