PCGameBenchmarks

Can GeForce RTX 5090 run Lost For Swords?

Great

The GeForce RTX 5090 handles Lost For Swords well at 1080p, delivering approximately 3054 FPS at High settings — above the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay. It can also achieve smooth 1440p at around 2291 FPS.

Lost For SwordsGeForce RTX 5090 FPS Data

Quality1080p1440p4K
Low999+ fps999+ fps999+ fps
Medium999+ fps999+ fps999+ fps
High999+ fps999+ fps999+ fps
Ultra999+ fps999+ fps993 fps

Estimated FPS · actual performance may vary based on drivers and settings

Minimum System Requirements

CPU
2 GHz Dual Core
GPU
OpenGL 3.2 compatible
RAM
2 GB

Genres

IndieRole-playing (RPG)Strategy

About

Lost For Swords, released in 2023, is an innovative Roguelike Deckbuilder that combines elements of indie RPG and strategy genres. Players navigate through a challenging tower, using a unique card-based mechanic to shape the environments, equip weapons and armor, and engage in tactical turn-based combat against a variety of monsters. This game stands out for its strategic depth and fun gameplay loop, which keeps each session fresh and engaging.

In terms of PC performance, Lost For Swords is quite accessible, requiring only an entry-level GPU with a minimum score around 300 to run smoothly. It's designed to perform well on moderate hardware, with recommendations leaning towards budget-friendly options like the NVIDIA GTX 1030 or equivalent. For optimal FPS and graphics settings, players should look for systems with at least 2 GB of RAM to ensure a smooth gaming experience as they explore its procedurally generated rooms.

If you enjoy strategic gameplay that combines card mechanics with RPG elements, Lost For Swords comes highly recommended. Its engaging systems and positive player reception make it a worthwhile addition to any indie game enthusiast's library, especially for those looking for new benchmarks in both gameplay and performance in the genre.

More Lost For Swords GPU benchmarks

Can GeForce RTX 5090 Run Lost For Swords? — 3054 FPS at 1080p | PCGameBenchmarks