PCGameBenchmarks

Can GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER run Magic Farm 3: The Ice Danger?

Great

The GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER handles Magic Farm 3: The Ice Danger well at 1080p, delivering approximately 2687 FPS at High settings — above the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay. It can also achieve smooth 1440p at around 2015 FPS.

Magic Farm 3: The Ice DangerGeForce RTX 4080 SUPER FPS Data

Quality1080p1440p4K
Low999+ fps999+ fps999+ fps
Medium999+ fps999+ fps999+ fps
High999+ fps999+ fps999+ fps
Ultra999+ fps999+ fps873 fps

Estimated FPS · actual performance may vary based on drivers and settings

Minimum System Requirements

CPU
800 MHZ
GPU
any DirectX 8 compatible
RAM
1 GB

Genres

Role-playing (RPG)SimulationStrategyIndie

About

"Magic Farm 3: The Ice Danger," released in 2019, is a charming addition to the indie farming simulator genre, blending RPG elements with strategic gameplay. Players take on the role of Iris, a girl with the special ability to cultivate magical plants while managing her farms and completing quests. The game continues the legacy of its predecessors, offering a playful yet engaging experience that resonates well with simulation fans.

In terms of PC performance, "Magic Farm 3: The Ice Danger" is quite accessible, requiring only an entry-level GPU with a minimum score of around 300. This means that even budget-friendly systems can achieve decent FPS while playing. With just 1 GB of RAM needed, players can expect smooth performance on modest hardware. For best results, any mid-tier GPU will ensure a satisfactory gaming experience without higher graphics settings overwhelming the system.

If you're a fan of indie RPGs and relaxing farming simulators, "Magic Farm 3: The Ice Danger" is worth considering. With its delightful gameplay mechanics and positive reception, this game offers a fulfilling experience for casual gamers looking for something soothing yet engaging.

More Magic Farm 3: The Ice Danger GPU benchmarks

Can GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER Run Magic Farm 3: The Ice Danger? — 2687 FPS at 1080p | PCGameBenchmarks